View Single Post
  #7  
Old 11-07-2019, 11:35 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Odd as it sounds, I think two European teams are easier to schedule than one. Some say logistically, a London team would have to spend four weeks at home and four weeks in the U.S. as a way of keeping the players from suffering constant jet lag. I also believe they should have a home base in the U.S. for the purpose of training camp and exhibition games.

The bye week can be used to help visiting teams adjust to their return and the season opener can be held in London on a Thursday so as to allow the first opponent a long week to prepare for Week 2.

Having a second European team allows for six teams (New England, the Jets and two rotating teams from the AFC and NFC the way the schedule now works) to play a two-week turn in Europe before having to return home. This would eliminate some of the advantage of playing jet-lagged teams.

The one trouble spot I haven't been able to overcome is what happens when a European team is good enough to host a playoff game? It's tough to ask a team out west to fly to a time zone 6-8 hours away with their entire season on the line. It's also not fair to make the European team fly to the States and play at a neutral site if they are the "home" team. I doubt the European fans would find that fair either.
Reply With Quote