I don't really know what to grade here. I know the draft pundits grade teams based on how they drafted compared to how that respective pundit had players ranked. Essentially it is an ego stroke to laud the teams who fall in line with their mocks/rankings and to blast the ones who didn't.
So far as the Texans go, they filled every need except DE and added additional picks in the process. There are some picks I liked more than others but I'm not going to sit here and try and project how each individual player will do. Instead, I will give the Texans a B for filling most positions of need, trading back (something I was very adament about,) and, I think, improving the team.
|