Quote:
Originally Posted by Xetuoh1836
I wonder why it effective game 2 and not the opener?
|
obviously he'll be active for the first game. they probably just gave it up in the base salary, said here is for the first game up front and anything beyond that is earned.
clearly ahman knows that he is pressing the texans with his injury situations, i just hope that when he does line up he shows that he can still run instead of showing that the injuries have gotten the better of him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunninRaven
Unless Slaton's turf toe is serious, in a way I halfway secretly hope Ahman is either great when he gets in the game, or completely terrible, because if he is great then I have no problem, the offense will look good. If he is terrible, then he won't last long before Slaton will take most, if not all, of his reps. But if Green is just sort of mediocre, then Kubiak might keep trotting him out there most of every game because he is the veteran and has the track record when Slaton could potentially be giving us more. I suppose on things like this I should just hope that Kubiak knows best and will play those that deserve it and can best help the team.
I just have this feeling that Slaton could be something special. Of course, I had the feeling about Jacoby last season as well.
|
i know it's semantics but when you're talking RB's something "special" is adrian peterson. steve slaton could be a good NFL back on a good team.
i don't think kubiak would allow shenanigans to go on concerning who is playing what position. i mean if slaton is better than green, he'll play.
MIKE (or really anybody) have you ever actually met someone who thinks they're worthy sports writers? aside from the awkward, seeping-through-the-radio inuendo of mchut and how dickie hates the teams he covers and loves ESPN's 24 hour analysis...is there actually any merit to the positions they hold anymore?
we should have our own forum dedicated to making fun of these two