I think I've mentioned that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It's apparent that 2 people can watch the same player and come up with a different grade. If you could compare the Raiders and the Jaguars draft board, I'm sure you would have plenty of room for debate.
Comparing apples to oranges and wondering why there's a difference. Different schemes and needs is only part of the difference. There is a reason why there are so many people in those draft War Rooms, varying opinions. Then there is the idea of gaming the game. Can I get a guy I like later so I can get another player that I like too.
Even here we are all considering the needs and scheme of the Texans. We often have different opinions on who is worth what. PK and I often share similar views on players and how they should be valued for the Texans. However, we still have some differences. He liked Amari Spievey more than I did and I probably valued Daniel Te'o-Nesheim more than he did.
So, there shouldn't be too much surprise to see that one team likes a guy in the 1st (Tyson Alualu) when another team sees him as a 3rd rounder.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
|