dadmg |
02-01-2010 06:04 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy
(Post 18190)
Honestly I really don't know what to make of these stats ? They sound impressive but really how meaningful are they ?
|
The only thing that would make me question the value of this stat in this application is that Cody's got a smaller sample size. Some of the high percentage linemen (like Mario, Shaun Ellis, and Justin Smith) made considerably more stops than Cody. Part of this can be explained by Cody not starting until week four, but small sample sizes can distort. For instance, a higher amount of tackles could indicate a more active lineman - then again it could just indicate someone on a bad defense with more opportunities.
So, what does this tell us? It tells us that the average tackle Mario and Cody made were pretty damn close to the line of scrimmage (1.4 yards) and not further away. It tells us that most of their tackles were meaningful stops as they kept offenses from getting a meaningful amount of yardage and moving the chains. These weren't total-padding tackles, they shut down the opposing offense. And it tells us that they were consistent in holding up against the run.
And from a team perspective, we improved dramatically against the run in FO's statistics jumping from 30th last year to 5th this year, even with our slow start. Obviously that's not all on Cody (*cough*Cushing, Pollard*cough*) but these statistics seem to support the idea that he played a definite role in our improvement.
|