IntheBullseye.com

IntheBullseye.com (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Texans (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Injury to Texans' Brisiel appears to be season-ending (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/showthread.php?t=799)

WMH 10-12-2009 11:08 PM

Injury to Texans' Brisiel appears to be season-ending
 
Well, it looks like we may get a glimpse of Caldwell whether we like it or not..... Starting O-Lineman #2 goes down for the year :(

From the chronic:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...t/6664525.html

"Right guard Mike Brisiel suffered what’s expected to be a season-ending foot injury during Sunday’s 28-21 loss at Arizona.

Kasey Studdard replaced Pitts. Rookie Antoine Caldwell and veteran Chris White will compete to see who’s going to start in place of Brisiel, who played every snap last season when the Texans averaged 115.4 yards a game and 4.3 yards a carry.

Caldwell, 6-3, 305, is a third-round pick from Alabama who has played center and guard.

“He worked a bunch (at right guard),” Kubiak said. “He worked at center in training camp so he could (learn to make) the calls. Since then, he’s basically been working at guard.”

White, 6-2, 290, is a five-year veteran. "

Roy P 10-12-2009 11:30 PM

Please, for the love of God, let Antoine play so we can see some movement along the line of scrimmage!!!! I'm already wondering if we need to draft Sergio Render or Mike Johnson. One is from Va Tech and the other is from Bama, so I know we have scouts at their games.

painekiller 10-13-2009 12:34 AM

We are in trouble now, is Fred Weary available to play?

mussop 10-13-2009 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14888)
Please, for the love of God, let Antoine play so we can see some movement along the line of scrimmage!!!! I'm already wondering if we need to draft Sergio Render or Mike Johnson. One is from Va Tech and the other is from Bama, so I know we have scouts at their games.

I like both of these guys alot. I still say we should of drafted Oher and Mack 1, 2 last draft. Both are starting and looking good.

I know alot of people here are high on him but im worried about Caldwell. I watched him alot in college and despite Bama running a similar scheme, I didnt think he was mobile enough for us. In college he had problems leaning forward too much and getting off balance in space. Hopefully they corrected that since. Guess we'll find out Sunday.

nunusguy 10-13-2009 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 14894)
I like both of these guys alot. I still say we should of drafted Oher and Mack 1, 2 last draft. Both are starting and looking good.

Definitely Oher. I mean all of us now like Cushing, but OTs are just more important than SAMs. We could have moved Winston inside and had Brown and Oher at OTs. That's why a team should place a higher priority on BPA than need with their first round picks.

Mike 10-13-2009 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 14891)
We are in trouble now, is Fred Weary available to play?

He works out at a gym in Bellaire. He is around.

NBT 10-13-2009 12:05 PM

[QUOTE=nunusguy;1489 OTs are just more important than SAMs.[/QUOTE]

You gotta open holes to score for sure, but you also need to stuff those holes when your opponent has the ball. I just don't understand your statement. LB's are just as important to winning as OT's IMO.

mussop 10-13-2009 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nunusguy (Post 14895)
Definitely Oher. I mean all of us now like Cushing, but OTs are just more important than SAMs. We could have moved Winston inside and had Brown and Oher at OTs. That's why a team should place a higher priority on BPA than need with their first round picks.

After rereading my post im not sure I worded that well. I meant Oher in the first and Mack in the Second round.

mussop 10-13-2009 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBT (Post 14900)
You gotta open holes to score for sure, but you also need to stuff those holes when your opponent has the ball. I just don't understand your statement. LB's are just as important to winning as OT's IMO.

Games are won and lost in the trenches. It doesnt matter how many great skill position guys you have if you cant block long enough to get them the ball, you will never score and therefore you will never win. Thats why you hear so many GM's say you should always build fron the inside out. No way is an OLB as important as a OT.

In fact no LB is as important as the DL in front of him. A LB is only as good as the DL in front of him. The best LB in the world isnt going to make a difference if the DL in front of him isnt capable of doing their job.

nunusguy 10-13-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBT (Post 14900)
You gotta open holes to score for sure, but you also need to stuff those holes when your opponent has the ball. I just don't understand your statement. LB's are just as important to winning as OT's IMO.

There's certain positions that are simply recognized as "the" premium positions", namely QB, OT, CB, 4-3 DLinemen, and OLB "in the 3-4 defense".

painekiller 10-13-2009 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike (Post 14897)
He works out at a gym in Bellaire. He is around.

But can he play, he was cut by Browns after only a few weeks.

Brandon Frye is now starting for the Seahawks, so he is unavailable.

Mike 10-13-2009 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 14905)
But can he play, he was cut by Browns after only a few weeks.

Brandon Frye is now starting for the Seahawks, so he is unavailable.

I think we dress Caldwell, bring up the guy from the PS to the active roster. (Stephanovich sp) and sign someone else to the PS. We puled Briesel off the scrap heap, so someone who has been practicing and in the system should have a leg up.

Lance Z was talking about Stephanovich this AM, thinks he has decent skills.

I am not sure the Texans will be eager to bring back Fred, especially after the Outside the Lines piece.

barrett 10-13-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBT (Post 14900)
You gotta open holes to score for sure, but you also need to stuff those holes when your opponent has the ball. I just don't understand your statement. LB's are just as important to winning as OT's IMO.

I think you are both right. LBs are just as important to winning as OTs.

However, you find good LBs all over the NFL and teams generally have no trouble procuring them. Undrafted LBs consistently have great success in the NFL while I don't know of any undrafted OTs who play at a high level.

Basic supply and demand here rather than whether a LB or OT helps you win more.

NBT 10-13-2009 04:49 PM

"Build from the inside out", meaning build the offense first. My reply to that is what the heck have we been doing since Kubes got here, if not building from within? I mean most of his first few drafts were heavy on offense. So, Now we have to build from the outside, meaning defense. Cushing has easily done for us on defense what Winston and Brown have done for us on offense - stabilize us. How can you possibly argue with that?

mussop 10-13-2009 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBT (Post 14910)
"Build from the inside out", meaning build the offense first. My reply to that is what the heck have we been doing since Kubes got here, if not building from within? I mean most of his first few drafts were heavy on offense. So, Now we have to build from the outside, meaning defense. Cushing has easily done for us on defense what Winston and Brown have done for us on offense - stabilize us. How can you possibly argue with that?

Building from the "inside out" means you start with the trenches (offense and defense) then work youre way out. Trenches = OL/DL.

Roy P 10-13-2009 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 14903)
Thats why you hear so many GM's say you should always build fron the inside out. No way is an OLB as important as a OT.

We drafted Duane Brown before we drafted Cushing, right? :confused:

Now you can say that we should get a RG, but do we justify an interior OL more important than LB?

mussop 10-13-2009 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14915)
We drafted Duane Brown before we drafted Cushing, right? :confused:

Now you can say that we should get a RG, but do we justify an interior OL more important than LB?

Yes we did. Do you consider this OL a finished product? Do you think we can win a champoinship with the current line?

Too youre second question, YES! Have you ever seen a team allow as much pressure from the middle as we do? The current interior/depth of this line is unnaceptable for a team that has championship aspirations. We have all seen what Shaub can do when given time. We have also seen what happens when we dont. We have some great skill players on this offense but none are as important as Schaub. If he isnt protected this whole team suffers. If he gets hurt this team takes a nose dive. There shouldnt be anything more important than getting him the protection he needs to get his job done.

mussop 10-13-2009 08:24 PM

Another thing. By no means am I suggesting reach for ANY position. But if you have the chance to draft an OL that is BPA and is versital enough to play inside (OG) or outside (OT) then hell yes take him over any LB.

Roy P 10-13-2009 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 14916)
Do you consider this OL a finished product? Do you think we can win a champoinship with the current line?


Have you ever seen a team allow as much pressure from the middle as we do?

No, no, and ummmm no.

I've advocated drafting interior linemen. The question has been, what's a "reach" for getting them in the draft. I was wanting Eric Wood in the 2nd round, he was a first round pick by the Bills last year. I considered Max Unger in the 2nd, but had Barwin as a 1st round talent that was the BPA, so I couldn't fault the Texans because the defense NEEDED a pass-rushing specialist opposite of Mario. I looked at Caldwell as being a 4th round talent when we took him in the 3rd, I was giving more significance to our Secondary and wanted Bulldog CB Asher Allen. However, when we selected in the 4th CB Glover Quinn (who arguably is as good if not better than My Guy Asher), there were not any OL prospects that I was hot after. So perhaps we did a good thing in getting Caldwell when we did.

Go back another draft for a second. We drafted OT Duane Brown in the 1st round, I thought that was a reach but understood the NEED of getting a LT and they were coming off the board quickly. We didn't have a 2nd round pick in that draft. If we had been able to get an OL, I was impressed with Mike Pollack, but would have selected RB Ray Rice instead. In the 3rd round, we drafted CB Antuan Molden and RB Steve Slaton - looking at OL candidates there; I was really high on Jeremy Zuttah.

Moral of the story, the 2nd round is probably the best time to get an impactful OL (especially interior players) but there are probably other impactful players at other positions that will tempt you. The third round is where you can get the best of the "left overs" who haven't been snagged, but can probably start within 2 years. The 4th round and higher are anybody's guess when it comes to OL. I'm not saying you can't get a good OL late in the draft, but on the 2nd day of the draft if you are selecting an OL, you won't be confident that THAT player will be improving your team. So, again, drafting Caldwell in the 3rd was probably smart strategy. We'll be able to see this weekend if that was really the case.

mussop 10-13-2009 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14919)
No, no, and ummmm no.

I've advocated drafting interior linemen. The question has been, what's a "reach" for getting them in the draft. I was wanting Eric Wood in the 2nd round, he was a first round pick by the Bills last year. I considered Max Unger in the 2nd, but had Barwin as a 1st round talent that was the BPA, so I couldn't fault the Texans because the defense NEEDED a pass-rushing specialist opposite of Mario. I looked at Caldwell as being a 4th round talent when we took him in the 3rd, I was giving more significance to our Secondary and wanted Bulldog CB Asher Allen. However, when we selected in the 4th CB Glover Quinn (who arguably is as good if not better than My Guy Asher), there were not any OL prospects that I was hot after. So perhaps we did a good thing in getting Caldwell when we did.

Go back another draft for a second. We drafted OT Duane Brown in the 1st round, I thought that was a reach but understood the NEED of getting a LT and they were coming off the board quickly. We didn't have a 2nd round pick in that draft. If we had been able to get an OL, I was impressed with Mike Pollack, but would have selected RB Ray Rice instead. In the 3rd round, we drafted CB Antuan Molden and RB Steve Slaton - looking at OL candidates there; I was really high on Jeremy Zuttah.

Moral of the story, the 2nd round is probably the best time to get an impactful OL (especially interior players) but there are probably other impactful players at other positions that will tempt you. The third round is where you can get the best of the "left overs" who haven't been snagged, but can probably start within 2 years. The 4th round and higher are anybody's guess when it comes to OL. I'm not saying you can't get a good OL late in the draft, but on the 2nd day of the draft if you are selecting an OL, you won't be confident that THAT player will be improving your team. So, again, drafting Caldwell in the 3rd was probably smart strategy. We'll be able to see this weekend if that was really the case.

Ive said this before, I am not as high on Caldwell as most. I watched him alot at Alabama and wasnt that impressed. He has a tendency to reach when in space and get off balance alot. That isnt a good quality to have in this system or any for that matter. Hopefully they have corrected that or he'll have been a wasted pick. I suspect that is why he hasnt cracked the lineup thus far. Hope Im wrong, we'll see.

Anyway my point is I dont see Caldwell as an upgrade. Like I said the OL is to important and not good enough to not upgrade, if you have a quality guy available, that could help immediately. Oher was there for the taking and could of played inside (huge upgrade) and in a pinch swung outside. Cushing has turned out a worthy pick (so far) but IMO Oher was the BPA and a need.

I dont want it to sound like im crying over spilt milk, im not. I like what Cushing has brought to this team physically and attitude wise. Im just saying my priority for building a winning team would be to solidify the trenches first. Thats just my philosophy. Therefore OL and DL will always come before any position unless of course a player at another position is a far superior talent.

Roy P 10-13-2009 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 14920)
Oher was there for the taking and could of played inside (huge upgrade) and in a pinch swung outside.

Therefore OL and DL will always come before any position unless of course a player at another position is a far superior talent.

Well, that is the thing about matching players with scheme. Oher is a Tackle and would not be drafted in the first round to play G, especially in our ZBS. We had Brown and Winston already on the roster so asking Winston to play G so a rookie could play RT wouldn't have been the prudent thing to do. If we didn't have Brown and we didn't run Gibbs' ZBS, Oher might be a very good pick. Watching him against Odom this past weekend showed he could hold his own as a LT in pass protection.

If I had your commitment to improving the OL instead of the DL in the last draft, then selecting Max Unger instead of Connor Barwin would have been an appropriate choice considering who we have on the roster, the scheme we run, and value of interior linemen.

In the upcoming draft, I'm pretty committed to improving our Secondary. The whole Dunta Robinson drama has left me feeling like we should move on. So, all things being equal I'm going to be focused on FS and CB in the first 2 rounds and then most likely look at RG and RB in the 3rd and 4th rounds. The funny thing is, I feel those are the best rounds to get the most value at those positions. That's based upon looking at the drafts of the last 7 years and when players were selected. Now, if a 1st round talented OL slides to the 2nd round and I believe I can get a decent CB in the 3rd, then I may flip flop my "plan" in that instance. For example, if Selvish Capers is on the board in the 2nd round, I might just have to take him. However, if I can get Jason Fox or Jon Asamoah in the 3rd round, I'll still be a happy Texan. :)

mussop 10-13-2009 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14921)
Well, that is the thing about matching players with scheme. Oher is a Tackle and would not be drafted in the first round to play G, especially in our ZBS. We had Brown and Winston already on the roster so asking Winston to play G so a rookie could play RT wouldn't have been the prudent thing to do. If we didn't have Brown and we didn't run Gibbs' ZBS, Oher might be a very good pick. Watching him against Odom this past weekend showed he could hold his own as a LT in pass protection.

If by prudent you mean it wouldnt make us better I dissagree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14921)
If I had your commitment to improving the OL instead of the DL in the last draft, then selecting Max Unger instead of Connor Barwin would have been an appropriate choice considering who we have on the roster, the scheme we run, and value of interior linemen.

Thats exactly what I would of done. A project pass rush specialist isnt nearly as valuable as a starting OL IMO. I had Mack as a first round talent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14921)
In the upcoming draft, I'm pretty committed to improving our Secondary. The whole Dunta Robinson drama has left me feeling like we should move on. So, all things being equal I'm going to be focused on FS and CB in the first 2 rounds and then most likely look at RG and RB in the 3rd and 4th rounds. The funny thing is, I feel those are the best rounds to get the most value at those positions. That's based upon looking at the drafts of the last 7 years and when players were selected. Now, if a 1st round talented OL slides to the 2nd round and I believe I can get a decent CB in the 3rd, then I may flip flop my "plan" in that instance. For example, if Selvish Capers is on the board in the 2nd round, I might just have to take him.

Like I said Im fine with taking a Berry over a good but not as talented OL but if things are equal Im going OL everytime.

Capers would be a great second round pick for us.

Roy P 10-13-2009 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 14922)
If by prudent you mean it wouldnt make us better I dissagree.


By prudent, I mean people's feelings wouldn't be hurt. Eric Winston was a 3rd round pick who thought he should have been a 1st rounder. Instead of putting him at LT, he gets put at RT, and has done a very good job there. Then a rookie is selected in the 1st round to keep Eric on the RT in the name of Duane Brown. Now Oher comes in and either moves D. Brown to LG so Pitts could go to RG or Oher becomes the RT and moves Winston to RG. Anyway you slice that, the OL would be jumbled (remember when people were talking about how nice it was to have continuity on the OL and no injuries allowed them to play 16 games together?).

I'm not saying any of the above scenarios wouldn't have been better on paper, I'm saying it would have pissed PEOPLE off who actually put on the uniform and play on Sunday. Basically it would just look bad and hurt too many egos including people like Rick Smith, Alex Gibbs, and Gary Kubiak.

Anway, that is water under the bridge. The OL is now 40% injured and we are needing to scramble. The new guy (Caldwell) may get in the lineup so we can see what he's got. Chis White or Rashad Butler are also on the roster for these "just in case" scenarios, so we can see what that looks like. Who knows, maybe the run game will improve?

Nconroe 10-13-2009 11:47 PM

I hope Breisel heals well and can make a come back next year. Next draft comes up when, April? past is past at this time.

Wonder if they will activate Andrey Crummey off practice squad to replace Briesel if he does go IR?

Any other FA OG's out there to look at, someone mentioned maybe invite Fred Weary in for a tryout?

And, I'm hoping Caldwell proves he can do well right away as a rookie.

painekiller 10-14-2009 02:35 AM

According to aj's blog
Quote:

worked out seven other players including veteran linebackers Monty Beisel, Rocky Boiman, Darnell Bing and Brandon Renkart, and free agent guards Terrence Metcalf, Adrian Jones and Tutan Reyes.
The guards are all veterans that should be able to play rather fast if needed. Jones was with the team during the off season.

We are down a LB currently thus the LBs brought in.

mussop 10-14-2009 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14923)
By prudent, I mean people's feelings wouldn't be hurt. Eric Winston was a 3rd round pick who thought he should have been a 1st rounder. Instead of putting him at LT, he gets put at RT, and has done a very good job there. Then a rookie is selected in the 1st round to keep Eric on the RT in the name of Duane Brown. Now Oher comes in and either moves D. Brown to LG so Pitts could go to RG or Oher becomes the RT and moves Winston to RG. Anyway you slice that, the OL would be jumbled (remember when people were talking about how nice it was to have continuity on the OL and no injuries allowed them to play 16 games together?).

Continuity is nice but cant overcome lack of talent. I think they were blinded (like most here) by a over inflated stat. I have said a thousand times if I have said it once. Being 3rd in the leauge in total yards dont mean squat if you are in the bottom half in scoring. But that is all you hear last year before the draft. " We have to go heavy defense because our offense is set. We were 3rd best offense in the NFL". We'll youre offense can only go as far as youre OL takes it. Have you ever seen a team with a weak OL or one without decent depth win consistantly?


Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14923)
I'm not saying any of the above scenarios wouldn't have been better on paper, I'm saying it would have pissed PEOPLE off who actually put on the uniform and play on Sunday. Basically it would just look bad and hurt too many egos including people like Rick Smith, Alex Gibbs, and Gary Kubiak.

I dont understand this line of reasoning. These players are professionals and get paid an incredible amount of money. If their egos get in the way of improving the team then they need to be shipped out. And I dont see how it would hurt the egos of Rick Smith, Alex Gibbs, and Gary Kubiak. Hell maybe thats whats wrong with this team. Everyone is worried about hurting each others egos instead of whats really important, putting the team first.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 14923)
Anway, that is water under the bridge. The OL is now 40% injured and we are needing to scramble. The new guy (Caldwell) may get in the lineup so we can see what he's got. Chis White or Rashad Butler are also on the roster for these "just in case" scenarios, so we can see what that looks like. Who knows, maybe the run game will improve?

Exactly they should of foreseen this. How often does a team go a whole year without injury to one of its linemen? We were extremely lucky last year. We have no quality depth and now we are in deep dodo becuase they didnt prepair for this. They had the opportunity to draft a starting caliber OL in the first and second round of the draft and chose to take lesser, riskier talent. But you are right its water under the bridge now. Hopefully Im wrong about Caldwell and he will turn out to be starting material. I guess we'll see.

mussop 10-14-2009 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 14926)
According to aj's blog


The guards are all veterans that should be able to play rather fast if needed. Jones was with the team during the off season.

We are down a LB currently thus the LBs brought in.

Man whats the deal with Buster Davis? He looked really good in the preseason. :confused:

Wasnt Darnell Bing a safety when he was in the draft?

Arky 10-14-2009 11:23 AM

Rocky Boiman, lb, might be a natural Texan - he's already got the battle red hair... :p

Re-signing Adrian Jones sounds good.... I believe he was a starter for KC so there's some experience there at least....

There's also the LSU center on the PS - one Brett Helms. Seems to be very small and light though @ 6'2"/270. Perhaps he figures into next year? If not, why keep him?

NBT 10-14-2009 03:33 PM

Why indeed. We need to get bigger and more physical on that offensive line.

Big Texas 10-14-2009 05:11 PM

If we sign anyone to our OL under 300 lb. I will have realized that Kubiak is extremely stubborn and is willing to nail that triangle into the square hole. His incompetence will be apparent.

Roy P 10-14-2009 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 14934)

Wasnt Darnell Bing a safety when he was in the draft?

Yeah, but he's probably a better WLB than say, Xavier Adibi.

Roy P 10-14-2009 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 14933)
Being 3rd in the leauge in total yards dont mean squat if you are in the bottom half in scoring.

If their egos get in the way of improving the team then they need to be shipped out. And I dont see how it would hurt the egos of Rick Smith, Alex Gibbs, and Gary Kubiak.

Yeah, we have an above average offense. At least it's respectable now that we don't have David Carr.

Egos are part of the NFL. It's a great job and only a very select few get to participate as players, coaches, GMs. So, they do have some reason to be arrogant. When things aren't going well, most people will try to "save face" so I'm not surprised when folks exhibit human nature.

Anyway, I'm done discussing psychology.

WMH 10-17-2009 07:49 AM

Per the chronic - White will start, and they will rotate Caldwell in every other serious.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...t/6671673.html

“They both worked extremely hard, and they're going to split time right down the middle unless one of them is just playing his tail off,” coach Gary Kubiak said after Friday's practice. “It's a great opportunity for both of them."


I gotta tell you, I don't like this one bit. How are they going to get any continuity if they are swapping every series. If Caldwell isn't ready...don't play him. Subbing guys every other series makes about as much sense as subbing them every third series...what a minute.....we did that too :(
Hopefully, one of them will stand out, and we can set up the Oline for the balance of the year. I am hoping for Caldwell. White is a nice backup, but Caldwell has got to produce for us in the future.

Big Texas 10-17-2009 09:56 AM

I am no longer in favor of anyone on this OLine less than 300. White is listed at 6'2 290. WOW. Are we taking a step backward here?

In fantasy land:

Maybe White is the better pass protector and will be crucial to this aerial assault we are about to lay on Cincy.

All I know is we better not be running any dives behind that guy.

Just a side note: He will be lined up opposite D. Peko. Many people may not be familiar with this "brick wall". But I am sure White will find out first hand.

White: 6'2 290
Peko: 6'3 320

He has thirty pounds on White, and he doesn't move. Sometimes this game comes down to who is the biggest and toughest. I guess we have already found that out this year.

If you have not realized it thus far, I am in favor of Caldwell. 6'3 305. I think he'll have a better shot...at least a better shot.

NBT 10-17-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Texas (Post 14964)
If we sign anyone to our OL under 300 lb. I will have realized that Kubiak is extremely stubborn and is willing to nail that triangle into the square hole. His incompetence will be apparent.


Does that mean he's a stubborn squarehead?

Nconroe 10-18-2009 10:09 PM

I know the OL wasn't perfect today, but they likely had their best game of the year, didn't they? I thought White and Caldwell both filled in pretty well for Breisel. Slayton and Brown had several good runs that don't count in the stats since called back due to holding and motion penalties. The OL as many on the team seem to be getting more consistent as games go by.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.