IntheBullseye.com

IntheBullseye.com (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Texans (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   [Salaam, Demps Cut] Preparing for the Superbowl (more great moves by Smithiak!) (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/showthread.php?t=447)

dalemurphy 02-25-2009 04:06 PM

[Salaam, Demps Cut] Preparing for the Superbowl (more great moves by Smithiak!)
 
Texans have cut WDemps and Ephraim Salaam today. So, that's another $3.0 million cap savings. I'm considering starting a petition to bring back Brandon Frye. Regardless, apparently our leaders have begun looking at game film instead of resume's. Rashod Butler is such a huge upgrade over Salaam as the swing that I'm almost hoping Winston gets injured. Now, Studdard is the only remaining obstacle to complete sanity for this organization. I guess they can wait until August to cut him though.

Since the organization is now apparently listening to my advice and acting on it, the following is the list of FAs they will be bidding on due to my insistance:

Sean Jones
Derrick Ward
Jake Groves
Bryant McFadden
Antonio Smith

book it, Dano!

Mike 02-25-2009 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8589)
Texans have cut WDemps and [B] Rashod Butler is such a huge upgrade over Salaam as the swing that I'm almost hoping Winston gets injured.
book it, Dano!

Book that as the dumbest quote ever uttered on this board. Winston is our best player on the OL.

barrett 02-25-2009 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike (Post 8601)
Book that as the dumbest quote ever uttered on this board. Winston is our best player on the OL.

what are you talking about. Didn't you read the rest of the post? Dalemurphy says it himself. He knows more about football than everyone else in the world combined. Who are you to question his football omnipotence.

dalemurphy 02-26-2009 12:09 AM

Are you people really unable to detect humor? Give me a break!

Nconroe 02-26-2009 12:28 AM

I enjoy the humor , and almost nothing upsets me anymore. I just want my 401k to come back within 10 years.

Arky 02-26-2009 12:38 AM

Eh, there's other Texan forums out there where the members take themselves waaaayyyy too seriously... This one is not too bad for the most part...

barrett 02-26-2009 01:18 AM

so you go over the top and you are humorous...someone else does it and you assume we're serious?

I mean, you couldn't have thought you'd make a post about how great you are and we'd all leave it alone.

jppaul 02-26-2009 01:35 AM

Yeah, this is what we all come to this site for... Look at it this way could be worse could be dead time in early summer.

bckey 02-26-2009 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arky (Post 8613)
Eh, there's other Texan forums out there where the members take themselves waaaayyyy too seriously... This one is not too bad for the most part...

Like the one I see dalemurphy post on constantly.

nunusguy 02-26-2009 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8608)
Are you people really unable to detect humor? Give me a break!

It's OK, his way of having fun. But I'm still trying to get the relevance of the handle ? I dunno, but maybe somebody should tell Dale this is a football website and not baseball ?

popanot 02-26-2009 08:47 AM

Was there football discussed in this thread? I must have missed it...

papabear 02-26-2009 09:27 AM

my only problem with this is I would still like to have a veteran like Salaam there to mentor Brown. I think Brown will be fine but having someone who has been around as long as Salaam can be a big benefit to a guy like Brown.

BigBull 02-26-2009 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8634)
my only problem with this is I would still like to have a veteran like Salaam there to mentor Brown. I think Brown will be fine but having someone who has been around as long as Salaam can be a big benefit to a guy like Brown.

I tend to agree with you in that I think you need a guy like Salaam that can even start in a pinch. Just not convinced that any of our young backups are good enough to start even in a pinch.:confused:

papabear 02-26-2009 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBull (Post 8637)
I tend to agree with you in that I think you need a guy like Salaam that can even start in a pinch. Just not convinced that any of our young backups are good enough to start even in a pinch.:confused:

I'm OK if Butler has to start a game here or there. I would like for Brown to have that mentor around though. Remember, he went to college as a TE and has limited experience as a LT. Gibbs is there, which is great, but sometimes it's easier to learn from another player.

barrett 02-26-2009 09:49 AM

but when there is a personality as big as ephraim, it makes it hard for a guy like Brown to truly come into his own.

dalemurphy 02-26-2009 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8638)
I'm OK if Butler has to start a game here or there. I would like for Brown to have that mentor around though. Remember, he went to college as a TE and has limited experience as a LT. Gibbs is there, which is great, but sometimes it's easier to learn from another player.

Winston is there and so is Pitts. All Ephraim could do his help him deliver a punchline and show him how to fall on his butt while pass blocking. I don't think either of those skills are important for Brown to learn.

papabear 02-26-2009 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8650)
Winston is there and so is Pitts. All Ephraim could do his help him deliver a punchline and show him how to fall on his butt while pass blocking. I don't think either of those skills are important for Brown to learn.


Oh please, just because you don't like Salaam doesn't mean he doesn't have something to offer. Pitts isn't a T. Winston doesn't have near the experience that Salaam did. Salaam has been in the league for 11 years at the most important/difficult position on the line, and a starter for most of it. You don't spend that much time at the position and not learn a few tricks of the trade. I don't know how much he helped coached Brown (or the other guys) but I've always heard positive things about Salaam as a teammate so I would assume he was helpful to the younger lineman.

I don't have any problem with them letting him go. I think we have adequate back up plans, but the veteran presence is more important off the field than on it. I'm glad Salaam was here the last three years.

dalemurphy 02-26-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8654)
Oh please, just because you don't like Salaam doesn't mean he doesn't have something to offer. Pitts isn't a T. Winston doesn't have near the experience that Salaam did. Salaam has been in the league for 11 years at the most important/difficult position on the line, and a starter for most of it. You don't spend that much time at the position and not learn a few tricks of the trade. I don't know how much he helped coached Brown (or the other guys) but I've always heard positive things about Salaam as a teammate so I would assume he was helpful to the younger lineman.

I don't have any problem with them letting him go. I think we have adequate back up plans, but the veteran presence is more important off the field than on it. I'm glad Salaam was here the last three years.

Just because the guy is likeable doesn't mean we can't be honest about the quality of football he played here. He was barely servicable for most of the time. I'm glad he was here to, but he shouldn't have been playing last season. Butler and Frye were both much better tackles than he was at that point in his career. Perhaps they wanted him there to tutor Brown. Fine, but he still was a poor LT at that point. Nothing wrong with being happy that the team is making good personnel decisions. That's all this thread was about. Teams don't win playoff games with tackles playing at the level Salaam has played the past 2 seasons.

barrett 02-26-2009 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8658)
Just because the guy is likeable doesn't mean we can't be honest about the quality of football he played here. He was barely servicable for most of the time. I'm glad he was here to, but he shouldn't have been playing last season. Butler and Frye were both much better tackles than he was at that point in his career. Perhaps they wanted him there to tutor Brown. Fine, but he still was a poor LT at that point. Nothing wrong with being happy that the team is making good personnel decisions. That's all this thread was about. Teams don't win playoff games with tackles playing at the level Salaam has played the past 2 seasons.

Plenty of teams win playoff games with a backup the level of Salaam, and that's what he was last year.

Either way I face a quandary here, Alex Gibbs' o-line knowledge vs. Dalemurphy's football omnipotence. Kind of like ditka vs. a hurricane. Too close to call. I guess I just have to defer to your brilliance again.

dalemurphy 02-26-2009 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrett (Post 8659)
Plenty of teams win playoff games with a backup the level of Salaam, and that's what he was last year.

Either way I face a quandary here, Alex Gibbs' o-line knowledge vs. Dalemurphy's football omnipotence. Kind of like ditka vs. a hurricane. Too close to call. I guess I just have to defer to your brilliance again.


especially since apparently Gibbs feels the same way I do. They cut him before camp because he's already convinced Butler is the better player- even though there hasn't even been as much as a team meeting since the season ended. Interesting, Salaam was signed to a tiny deal through the season and Butler is a RFA, whom they will now have to tender for more money than they were paying Salaam, and yet the job has been handed to Butler without even one off-season workout. Looks like the coaches saw the same things I did last year.

papabear 02-26-2009 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8658)
Just because the guy is likeable doesn't mean we can't be honest about the quality of football he played here. He was barely servicable for most of the time. I'm glad he was here to, but he shouldn't have been playing last season. Butler and Frye were both much better tackles than he was at that point in his career. Perhaps they wanted him there to tutor Brown. Fine, but he still was a poor LT at that point. Nothing wrong with being happy that the team is making good personnel decisions. That's all this thread was about. Teams don't win playoff games with tackles playing at the level Salaam has played the past 2 seasons.


I never said anything about him playing great the last couple of years. His skills were in decline when he first arrived here, and I was one of those praying for an upgrade last year. I was simply referring to his amount of experience and the knowledge that comes with it, nothing else. I agree he was not who I would want as a starter, but you shouldn't discount how much a player like him can help in the film room, during practice, and on the sidelines by teaching the younger guys like Brown and Butler. Unless he decides to hang em up I wouldn't be surprised to see him in a similar role on another team this year.

I think the fact that they are letting Salaam go says as much about their confidence level in Brown as it does about their faith in Butler (or your abilities as a talent evaluator :D). If they didn't have plenty of faith in Brown they would likely bring back Salaam and his experience. Salaam was making 830,000 last year with a cap number of about 1.1 MILL. I don't know what his salary would have been this year, but I'm sure he was due at least a small raise. Butler will not likely get more than a second round tender IMO, so he will earn either 1 MILL for the low tender or 1.5 Mill for the second round tender(it's possible they give him one of the higher tenders but I doubt it). Their salaries would have been relatively close this year. The decision to keep the younger one who has been developing nicely or an older guy who's skills are declining as your back up is not exactly one that requires the use of a crystal ball.

Roy P 02-26-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8654)
Oh please, just because you don't like Salaam doesn't mean he doesn't have something to offer. Pitts isn't a T. Winston doesn't have near the experience that Salaam did.

I'm glad Salaam was here the last three years.

Chester has played T in the NFL before and many people on this board wanted him to play LT after Spencer went down. He is also a Veteran on this football team, so I would expect him to become more of a leader and mentor.

Salaam provided some invaluable service to this team in the lockerroom. I will not deny that. However, his play on the field will not be missed terribly. It was time to let him go for the good of the franchise.

If the Eagles can let a leader like Brian Dawkins walk out the door, we should be able to get by without Ephraim. I realize that there's a difference in salary, but the point is that leadership only has so much value.

papabear 02-26-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 8668)
Chester has played T in the NFL before and many people on this board wanted him to play LT after Spencer went down. He is also a Veteran on this football team, so I would expect him to become more of a leader and mentor.

Yes, but he only did it for one year. He doesn't have the same level of familiarity with the position as Salaam. I don't doubt Pitts ability as leader on that line one bit.
Quote:

Salaam provided some invaluable service to this team in the lockerroom. I will not deny that. However, his play on the field will not be missed terribly. It was time to let him go for the good of the franchise.
Don't disagree at all.

Quote:

If the Eagles can let a leader like Brian Dawkins walk out the door, we should be able to get by without Ephraim. I realize that there's a difference in salary, but the point is that leadership only has so much value.
True, although I was referring more to Salaam as a type of player/coach than as a locker room leader. Truthfully, Salaam might not even be very good as a teacher. I have no way of knowing for sure, but I think it's a pretty good guess. Either way he served a valuable role on this team. It was definitely time to for him to go and let the younger guys develop. I'm just not going to start doing cartwheels because he's gone. I think he did a good job of doing what we asked of him the last few years, back-up both T spots and fill in when needed.

barrett 02-26-2009 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8661)
especially since apparently Gibbs feels the same way I do. They cut him before camp because he's already convinced Butler is the better player- even though there hasn't even been as much as a team meeting since the season ended. Interesting, Salaam was signed to a tiny deal through the season and Butler is a RFA, whom they will now have to tender for more money than they were paying Salaam, and yet the job has been handed to Butler without even one off-season workout. Looks like the coaches saw the same things I did last year.

That's my point. That's why I am deferring to your brilliance again. That and your 398 career home runs. You're the man Dale.

painekiller 02-26-2009 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8661)
Interesting, Salaam was signed to a tiny deal through the season and Butler is a RFA, whom they will now have to tender for more money than they were paying Salaam, and yet the job has been handed to Butler without even one off-season workout. Looks like the coaches saw the same things I did last year.

First off dale I am glad you decided to join our board and I hope you continue.

Now for my point to your statement above, we are assuming that Butler will be the swing tackle, they could sign another veteran or draft someone higher than we expect, and then we would be wrong.

Don't you love the off season?

dalemurphy 02-26-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 8674)
First off dale I am glad you decided to join our board and I hope you continue.

Now for my point to your statement above, we are assuming that Butler will be the swing tackle, they could sign another veteran or draft someone higher than we expect, and then we would be wrong.

Don't you love the off season?

True, what if they surprise us all and draft Oher in the first?- with the idea of kicking Winston in at guard

And you're right... I'm assuming this move has a lot to do with their faith in Butler. Since I wasn't on this board last August/September, there is no history of me being bewildered that they kept Studdard and Salaam around at the expense of what I thought appeared to be much better players- cetainly players with more potential and a better fit of the pure ZBS. I'm simply encouraged to see that the organization has raised their expectations. My problem with the team keeping Salaam is that they knew exactly what level of play he would give them- and, IMO, that level is unsatisfactory for a team attempting to win... Meanwhile, they exposed Frye to the P.S. That, I think, was a big mistake and I'm elated that they aren't exposing Butler to the market in order to keep Salaam this year.

Roy P 02-26-2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 8674)
they could draft someone higher than we expect, and then we would be wrong.

I could see this crew drafting Jamon Meredith in the 2nd round (he's from S. Carolina and he's an "athletic" OL). Immediately following the pick, I'd have to replace my T.V. because I'll probably through a Guinness bottle right through the screen.

mussop 02-26-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalemurphy (Post 8679)
True, what if they surprise us all and draft Oher in the first?- with the idea of kicking Winston in at guard

And you're right... I'm assuming this move has a lot to do with their faith in Butler. Since I wasn't on this board last August/September, there is no history of me being bewildered that they kept Studdard and Salaam around at the expense of what I thought appeared to be much better players- cetainly players with more potential and a better fit of the pure ZBS. I'm simply encouraged to see that the organization has raised their expectations. My problem with the team keeping Salaam is that they knew exactly what level of play he would give them- and, IMO, that level is unsatisfactory for a team attempting to win... Meanwhile, they exposed Frye to the P.S. That, I think, was a big mistake and I'm elated that they aren't exposing Butler to the market in order to keep Salaam this year.

First I would be really excited about our OL if we were to draft Oher. That would be sweet. Second I agree about Fry. I guess the coaches seen something we werent privy to. I sure thought he would turn out to be a quality backup at worst.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.