IntheBullseye.com

IntheBullseye.com (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Texans (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   How Tight is the QB Leash? Or is Schaub Just Too Conservative? (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1603)

Keith 01-14-2013 03:59 PM

How Tight is the QB Leash? Or is Schaub Just Too Conservative?
 
Of the many things to pull out of the playoff loss to the Pats was the difference in how the Pats and Belichick seem to let Brady run the offense (recall Belichick hardly looking up when Brady threw a 2nd half TD?) and Kubiak who never seems to let Schaub audible (recall Schaub anxiously waiting the playcall into his helmet during the waning minutes of the 4th quarter?).

There is a problem here for the Texans. Schaub knows this offense by now. There are times when it seems Kubiak won't let him cut loose. There are times too when it seems like Schaub has deeper passing options available though he goes for the safer pass.

There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on where Schaub is getting tossed by fans in favor of guys like Alex Smith and T.J. Yates. Which if you've ever watched football, you'll know these fans haven't. Schaub is better than both, easily.

Kubiak learned from Shanahan who learned from Bill Walsh to script plays. Old Sept 2000 article from The Sporting News saved here goes into a lot on that, btw (it's a long but interesting read). Of course a lot of teams script plays, but Kubiak seems to have over-scripted Schaub sometimes.

I think it is one thing for Kubiak to use a script to reel in someone a little more free-spirited like Jake Plummer or maybe even a better improvisor like RG3 now with the Shanahans in Washington, but Schaub seems like the opposite where he needs to be given the green light more often to open up the offense more. Schaub waiting for the playcall and huddling the offense with just 9 minutes to play down three scores last night is just insane.

Brady, Manning, Rodgers... I don't see any of those guys having a 4th quarter like the one Schaub had last night, and I don't mean that as a knock on what Schaub can and can't do (like, ahem, throw the out route). Schaub is a 9-yr vet. Kubiak needs to empower him to act like one.

chuck 01-14-2013 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 33674)
Schaub is a 9-yr vet. Kubiak needs to empower him to act like one.

Good luck with that.

popanot 01-14-2013 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 33674)
There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on where Schaub is getting tossed by fans in favor of guys like Alex Smith and T.J. Yates. Which if you've ever watched football, you'll know these fans haven't. Schaub is better than both, easily.

Pretty bold statement. Not saying Yates is the answer, nor am I saying he should be handed the starting job, but you don't think they should at least open the competition? If Schaub beats him out, so be it, but there should be competition.

Even at that, I'd like to know what Schaub has that is clearly better than Yates (or maybe Smith, or someone else...)?

Athleticism? I'd give Yates the advantage.
Arm Strength? Yates.
Mobility? Yates.
Accuracy? Perhaps Schaub, but certainly not by much - if at all.
Pocket Awareness and Quick-Twitch Reflex? Haven't seen enough of Yates, but Schaub's a statue.
Smarts? Kubiak apparently doesn't think Schaub's all that if he can't even let him audible in basic, low-pressure situations.

DEC 2011: Yates (a rookie w/zero camp and practice 1rst team reps) 2W's-3L's / 1-1 in playoffs. Yes, Yates played poorly, but they were in each of the losses and were in the playoff game.
DEC 2012: Schaub (9yr vet w/ALL 1st team reps) 2W's-3L's / 1-1 in playoffs. Schaub played poorly in most of the loses and was awful in the 2 games against the Pats.

It pains me to even bring Yates into the equation, I wanted (want) Schaub to succeed. However, we now know what Schaub can do. And that's mostly beat the teams he should, but crater in the big games that count.

If the Texans don't think Yates can be a future starter, then they better damn well make sure they draft or trade for someone who can in the very near future. Just think of where this franchise will be if Schaub falls on his face again next year without the potential QB answer in the pipeline.

EDIT: And let me just add, if the Texans don't think it's Yates, I'm all for drafting one of the top QB's in this year's draft if one of them falls to late-2nd or 3rd Rd and taking a chance he'll develop. They need to get someone who has potential in the pipeline.

popanot 01-14-2013 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 33674)
There is a problem here for the Texans. Schaub knows this offense by now. There are times when it seems Kubiak won't let him cut loose. There are times too when it seems like Schaub has deeper passing options available though he goes for the safer pass.

It's frustrating that Kubiak will not pull off the reins and at least let Schuab audible and also run hurry-up on his own from time to time. Hell, at least try it and practice it in games against lessor opponents. I think it's all Kubiak there. As for Schaub and the deep ball, I think he's 1)gun shy not wanting to make a mistake, 2)no one gets open deep consistently enough to build his confidence by hitting a few, and 3)he either no longer has the arm strength to get it there on time and accurately, or, there's a slight injury we don't know about.

barrett 01-14-2013 08:29 PM

I am with Keith. If you think Yates is the answer you have not watched much football. He was awful last year. He was terrible in his only action this year. Arizona and jacksonville would pass on him. He was bad in the preseason. He is not an NFL starting qb.

Smith adds a measure of mobility but is even more limited in terms of arm strength and the deep ball. I would see him as a lateral move at best.

I'd love to see a qb switch but only for a real upgrade or a guy with potential to be a big upgrade. I'd trade a 2nd for Kurt cousins right now or spend a pick on an unnamed qb. There is no available veteran that interests me.

chuck 01-14-2013 08:43 PM

The team has just given Schaub an extension worth $100000000000 that kicks in next year. He's not going anywhere.

I guess there are several ways to interpret that last sentence and sadly they are all valid.

Fonz the Boss 01-14-2013 11:25 PM

One thing I wanted to do this year is avoid all forums seeing as how every time I say something, I jinx it. Now that I know I'm not the jinx I can finally get back posting. Let me begin by saying that I have always been a Matt Schaub defender, even through the late regular season collapse. Reason for that was because of guys like Dilfer, Grossman and Brad Johnson being able to reach the Super Bowl. Now I'm not so sure because the game has changed alot since those guys. Defenses are never going to be that dominant ever again with all the rule changes. Also, the new era QBs have rocket arms and 4.3 40 speed. If you are a slow immobile QB then your last name better be Brady, Manning or Brees. I wish I could be wrong about Matt Schaub because I like him but I'm not so sure. I do know with 100% certainty that we are stuck with him for at least one more year. Maybe he can get it done if we get the right side of our O line fixed and put more speed at the WR position... I know this is a long shot but if Schaub doesn't get it done next year and RGIII ends the season healthy, then I would want us to make a push on a deal for Kirk Cousins.

Arky 01-15-2013 02:03 AM

Kubes was speaking very highly of Keenum today on his radio show. I like Keenum myself and wouldn't mind it if they could auction off TJ and move Keenum into the #2 spot. He's definitely got skills (and decent wheels) - not your prototypical height, though.

I remember Keenum threw a beauty of a touch pass in preseason this year - you could almost hear the crowd gasp as it was so alien-looking....

----------------------------------

And I'd like to briefly interrupt (my) Schaub-bashing to point out that Schaub also had a creative pass yesterday. Texans were backed up to their 5 yard line or so and it looked like Schaub was going to get creamed for a safety when he somehow flung the ball out to Foster on the screen for a 25-30 yard gain. Nice play. Wish there would have been more.

popanot 01-15-2013 06:09 AM

Didn't even think of Keenum, but yeah, let him compete too. No one is saying Yates is the answer, but I think we've all come to the conclusion Schaub isn't. Open competition is what people are asking for! Whether it's Yates, Keenum, or some aging veteran, bring in competition to push Schaub.

WMH 01-15-2013 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by popanot (Post 33685)
Didn't even think of Keenum, but yeah, let him compete too. No one is saying Yates is the answer, but I think we've all come to the conclusion Schaub isn't. Open competition is what people are asking for! Whether it's Yates, Keenum, or some aging veteran, bring in competition to push Schaub.

No disrespect, but you are delusional if you think Kubiak is going to open up the QB competition because that is what "people" are asking for, especially the season that starts his extension.

Schaub and Kubiak are tied at the hip. When McNair decides Kubiak can't get this team to the promise land, that is likely when you get a new HC, scheme and a new QB.

HPF Bob 01-15-2013 09:42 AM

WMH, that is probably correct. Schaub was brought here by Kubiak for Kubiak's offense and I don't see them cutting him loose or forcing him to win a job but the question remains whether the Texans have gone as far as they can with this group of players and coaches? I'd like to think there is another player addition or two that can raise us to the next level but it will be difficult with the cap and the fact that some key players are aging and their window of opportunity may close soon.

Sorta like Bagwell. When the Astros were finally able to get to the Series, Bagwell was just a shell of his self and couldn't contribute. I don't want that to be AJ's legacy too.

popanot 01-15-2013 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WMH (Post 33687)
No disrespect, but you are delusional if you think Kubiak is going to open up the QB competition because that is what "people" are asking for, especially the season that starts his extension.

Schaub and Kubiak are tied at the hip. When McNair decides Kubiak can't get this team to the promise land, that is likely when you get a new HC, scheme and a new QB.

Never said he WOULD, said he SHOULD. McNair and Smith should mandate it just like they mandated he hire Wade. Kubiak has proven he's either too stubborn or too stupid to make the hard decisions and sometimes needs a kick in the ass to move. And I agree with you in that, unfortunately, Kubiak and Schaub will sink this ship together.

chuck 01-15-2013 10:10 AM

For those of you who listen to sports talk in Houston or are just generally more attentive than I am has Kubiak ever addressed why he totally abandoned the bootleg rollout down the stretch? That was an incredibly effective play and for some reason he just quit calling it altogether. I think that abandoning that play also had a negative effect on the running game.

Keith 01-15-2013 10:22 AM

chuck, haven't heard.

This is a Schaub vs. Kubiak thread, so I don't mean to derail it, but don't forget the Pats scored 41 points too... it's not all on the offense. The Pats just seems to be like what the Sonics were to the Rockets in the early 90s... a bad mismatch.

I do wonder if this team will ever break through. I think they'd need homefield to do it most likely. Had Sunday's game been at home against the Ravens, then perhaps we'd be anticipating the Texans playing the AFC Championship game this Sunday (though they'd probably again get carved up by Brady or Peyton Manning).

I think this team is built to win 11-12 games every year and set us up for disappointment annually around mid-January. Since Kubiak, Schaub, and Wade Phillips might be around a few more years, maybe they outlast the careers of Brady and Manning, but not Luck, who seems ready to torment us for the next decade. I could see this team having another 5 more teasing playoff years to have a run like the Oilers in the late-80s to early 90s and still never get past the divisional round.

Keith 01-15-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by popanot (Post 33679)
Athleticism? I'd give Yates the advantage.
Arm Strength? Yates.
Mobility? Yates.
Accuracy? Perhaps Schaub, but certainly not by much - if at all.
Pocket Awareness and Quick-Twitch Reflex? Haven't seen enough of Yates, but Schaub's a statue.
Smarts? Kubiak apparently doesn't think Schaub's all that if he can't even let him audible in basic, low-pressure situations.

DEC 2011: Yates (a rookie w/zero camp and practice 1rst team reps) 2W's-3L's / 1-1 in playoffs. Yes, Yates played poorly, but they were in each of the losses and were in the playoff game.
DEC 2012: Schaub (9yr vet w/ALL 1st team reps) 2W's-3L's / 1-1 in playoffs. Schaub played poorly in most of the loses and was awful in the 2 games against the Pats.

First, I don't mean to write Yates off completely. But the little I saw him play in 2012 didn't show me he had a ton of improvement from 2011. And I was actively looking for it. It takes average QBs like Yates and Schaub 3 years or so of experience to be comfortable in this offense, so I'm not ready to give up on Yates, but let's not delude ourselves into thinking he will be ready in 2013.

Comparing December won-loss records doesn't mean much to me in large part because the defense was much better in 2011.

If Yates was under center on Sunday, do the Texans score 28 points? I don't think so. What evidence suggests Yates is capable of leading the offense to score more? If anything Yates is far more turnover prone than Schaub.

popanot 01-15-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 33693)
Comparing December won-loss records doesn't mean much to me in large part because the defense was much better in 2011.

If Yates was under center on Sunday, do the Texans score 28 points? I don't think so. What evidence suggests Yates is capable of leading the offense to score more? If anything Yates is far more turnover prone than Schaub.

Yes, I understand those stats don't mean much. The main point I was trying to make is they both played poorly in DEC crunch time, but Yates did it as a rookie with limited reps, whereas, Schaub did it in full practice/starter mode with 9yrs. experience. Trust me, I'm not saying Yates SHOULD be the starter. However, I do think he and others -whoever that may be- should get a shot. We know what Schaub is at this point, and I still think that someone else who has a full camp and practice with the starters could be just as effective in this offense as Schuab, if not better. Whether that's Yates, Keenum, Matt Barkely, Tyler Wilson, whoever, they need to find that guy ASAP b/c Schaub isn't getting it done.

barrett 01-15-2013 12:29 PM

Yates should not get a shot. He has never shown anything to merit a chance to start. You don't offer a job to a completely unqualified applicant because you don't like the current guy's performance. Did you watch Yates in the preseason this year? John beck was better. If we cut Yates does anyone think another team would give him a chance to start?

There are many cheap veteran FAs we could sign who are way more qualified and talented if we want a QB competition.

Arky 01-15-2013 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by popanot (Post 33696)
........... Whether that's Yates, Keenum, Matt Barkely, Tyler Wilson, whoever, they need to find that guy ASAP b/c Schaub isn't getting it done..........

Unfortunately, I think the only way we will be able to see one of these high upside guys, (I think Keenum has more upside than Yates) is probably going to take an injury to Schaub. At that point, you would hope that Mr. Upside could take advantage of the opportunity..... I would like to see Kubes give someone else a shot in-game for a few plays - for example, kinda like the way Kaepernick was introduced into the lineup. Let the backup/upside guy run a special package or two per game..... But I don't think Kubes would be open to that ..... as long as Schaub is healthy, he gets all the snaps - that's just the way Gary rolls.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith (Post 33692)
I think this team is built to win 11-12 games every year and set us up for disappointment annually around mid-January. ..............

I was just thinking about this - what if the Texans go 10-6 next year but still make the playoffs as a 4th or 5th seed? I'm thinkin' a lot of people would find that unacceptable....

What if they go 9-7 and don't make the playoffs? Can you imagine the uproar?

popanot 01-15-2013 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrett (Post 33700)
There are many cheap veteran FAs we could sign who are way more qualified and talented if we want a QB competition.

Amen! Then lets get one of those guys!! I'm only tossing Yates out there because 1)he's under contract and on our team, 2)at least he's familiar with the system, and 3)Kubiak and Smith hand picked this guy last year. I don't care who it is, really. Bring in someone who can push or compete with Schaub.

popanot 01-15-2013 12:57 PM

Just to be clear, I understand we're likely stuck with Schaub for at least 1 year if not 2 years. I get it. However, that dosen't mean I like it or think that Texans management should just sit on their behinds expecting big things from him. Seattle made a tough decision sitting the guy they just paid millions to. They let another QB compete and it paid off. Obviously Wilson turned out to be special and there's no guarantee the Texans find that guy, but with Kubiak and this thinking they're tied into starting Schaub because of his salary, well then they're paralyzed and we'll likely never find out while they burn through the current talent and chances they do have. If the Texans true goal is to win a SB, they shouldn't give a flying flip if Schaub's a high-priced bench warmer for 2 years.

Keith 01-15-2013 01:41 PM

Well, something to keep in mind is these guys are human beings. After Kubiak left Denver, the Broncos were getting tired of annual playoff appearances going nowhere with Jake Plummer. So Shanahan used a first round pick on Jay Cutler with Plummer still on the roster. Plummer was then benched with a 7-4 record, grew a beard and retired from football that offseason. Oh, and the Broncos began to really suck from that point and once Shanahan was gone, they hired someone else who really accelerated the downward spiral.

So asking the Texans to jumpstart Phase One of the "Replace Schaub" operation isn't going to help the team win more games in 2013 or go any deeper in the playoffs in 2013. And I am specific to 2013 because this team's window to win a Super Bowl is RIGHT NOW.

They have the other key pieces in place. Short of getting lightning to strike like it did in 2012 with all these rookie QBs, only bringing in someone like very experienced like the Broncos did with Manning would seem to enhance the team's chances in 2013. And there isn't another Manning available this offseason (no, it's not Alex Smith).

I think the 49ers are incredibly lucky that their midseason QB switch has gone as well as it had. Usually a team with 2 QBs is said to be a team that doesn't have one at all. Bringing in Schaub's 2014 or 2015 replacement in 2013 will only divide the locker room and drive us all nuts. They'd have to do like what the Oilers did with Steve McNair and just flat out be committed to Schaub in 2013, keeping an early draft pick like that on the bench. Nobody does that anymore for good reason... it's expensive for one thing. Oh, and apparently there isn't a strong QB prospect in this draft anyway.

WMH 01-15-2013 02:05 PM

Playoff Schaub > Playoff Peyton

;)

We could do alot worse.

Comp Att Pct Att/G Avg Yds/G TD Int 1st 1st% Lng 20+ Sck Rate
Manning 28 43 65.1 43 6.7 290 3 2 15 34.9 32 2 3 88.3
Schaub 63 89 70.8 44.5 6.8 302.5 2 2 32 36 28 8 1 87.5

Joshua 01-15-2013 02:26 PM

I can't believe I'm actually about to say this, but of all the guys who we could realistically go after this offseason (and I'm using realistically pretty liberally as the Texans clearly are going with Schaub and this is all just messageboard fodder), the guy I would be most curious about is Vick. Get him and Schaub back together and let them compete. Vick had absolutely no chance last year with the horrid O-line the Eagles threw out there and pretty much the whole team started mailing it in around mid-October. Plus, after watching RGIII in Washington, the thought of Vick running the bootlegs for us sounds pretty good. If nothing more than a change of pace from watching Schaub lumber around.

barrett 01-15-2013 04:44 PM

The time to cut ties was last year when Manning was available (and reports had him interested in coming). We have a far better roster, and believe it or not far better coaching.

Now we are in a spot where the best available veteran QBs are not an upgrade.

So that leaves the draft as a means of improvement, and I cannot see a coach whose job relies on going deep in the playoffs hitching his wagon to a rookie QB. Especially not in a year where nobody is excited about any of the QBs, let alone the ones available in the late 1st/middle rounds.

It will almost certainly be Schaub again for this year (and likely for as long as Kubiak is here). We would have been better off with a home loss to Cincy that MIGHT have prompted change.

Arky 01-15-2013 06:11 PM

I'm just looking at it like this: What if Schaub gets injured (out for the year) in Week 2 of 2013? Who's going to be the break-glass-in-case-of-emergency QB waiting on the other side of the glass? Who do you want that QB to be? I'm thinking if TJ is still here, it will be TJ. Just like the playoffs last year, a vet would probably be brought in to be his backup....

The only QB competition I think to realistically happen in 2013 is to find out who is Schaub's backup.....

nunusguy 01-15-2013 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua (Post 33707)
I can't believe I'm actually about to say this, but of all the guys who we could realistically go after this offseason (and I'm using realistically pretty liberally as the Texans clearly are going with Schaub and this is all just messageboard fodder), the guy I would be most curious about is Vick. Get him and Schaub back together and let them compete. Vick had absolutely no chance last year with the horrid O-line the Eagles threw out there and pretty much the whole team started mailing it in around mid-October. Plus, after watching RGIII in Washington, the thought of Vick running the bootlegs for us sounds pretty good. If nothing more than a change of pace from watching Schaub lumber around.

Vick is intriguing: he can throw the ball vertically and certainly has the mobility to put some real teeth in those bootlegs compared to Schaub's boots which are just kinda amusing because they represent such an empty threat.
But in spite of Schaub's interception, I don't think he played that badly Sunday and could have beat the Pats with last years team. Without Brisiel, Winston, and Dresseen in the lineup the Texans field a much less formidable rushing attack.

Keith 01-15-2013 11:58 PM

Vick's career completion percentage is 56.3%. Only once was he ever over 60% in a single season (2010). Only once has he ever played all 16 regular season games (2006). Baggage aside, it's intriguing, a la Randall Cunningham in 1998. But realistically, yeah it's message board fodder.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arky (Post 33710)
I'm just looking at it like this: What if Schaub gets injured (out for the year) in Week 2 of 2013? Who's going to be the break-glass-in-case-of-emergency QB waiting on the other side of the glass? Who do you want that QB to be?

Well, few teams are really strong at backup QB. Can't say that T.J. Yates is a bad one... I do realize he did win a playoff game. I'm ok with him and Keenum dueling for the backup job again next summer. One of them might show some true improvement.

barrett 01-16-2013 10:28 AM

Vick also averages more fumbles per game than anyone in NFL history.

He has already said he is not a backup, so he is not coming here to share time with Schaub or to be in a QB rotation. So if you sign him it is to make him the unquestioned starter. I don't see that for a guy who plays 8 games a year (and plays those 8 games in a mediocre way).

The veteran replacements are not upgrades. Maybe we sign a Henne type to push, but even then the best you can hope for is that the guy never sees the field.

I think you either continue to be a divisional round team with Schaub, or you hit reset in the draft (or through a guy like Cousins). I doubt we have the guts to reset, especially after the whole team already came out behind Schaub to try to put the story to rest.

I think McNair is more interested in running a "quality" and respected organization than he is in winning superbowls. If we go 12-4 and win division titles with Schaub than I am betting everyone keeps their job and we get to beat the Bengals in round 1 again next year.

popanot 01-16-2013 11:24 AM

With Eagles hiring Chip Kelly, they might very well consider keeping Vick around. He seems to fit Kelly's system better than Foles. With that being said, the Eagles might even be looking at drafting someone like Geno Smith with their #1 now and putting Foles on the trading block. I'm sure there's a few teams that would be interested in Foles (KC, OAK, AZ, JAX, BUF, etc.). Wish the Texans would be one of them, but we know better. :(

Warren 01-16-2013 12:17 PM

Throwing another name out there -- what about Kevin Kolb, as a Matt Leinart-type project? The Cards are expected to dump him because he'll be owed a $2 million roster bonus in March and then $9 million in salary for the season.

barrett 01-16-2013 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warren (Post 33722)
Throwing another name out there -- what about Kevin Kolb, as a Matt Leinart-type project? The Cards are expected to dump him because he'll be owed a $2 million roster bonus in March and then $9 million in salary for the season.

I'd do it. Kolb has the mobility for our system and he's very accurate on short throws. Plus one of kubiaks unquestioned abilities is helping a QB feel more comfortable. He could be a game manager in this system and he's at least got the possibility of upside.

popanot 01-16-2013 01:18 PM

Would love to have Kolb in here to compete with Schaub. Only problem I see with a FA QB is, they would not be guaranteed to start here and would even be considered a long-shot to unseat Schaub due to the Kubiak factor. They'd have a much better chance of getting paid and starting for one of the teams I mentioned above who are desperate for a QB.

cadams 01-16-2013 01:24 PM

i don't think schaub is the guy to get the texans to the super bowl after this playoff run either, but what about kolb's time in arizona makes anyone think he would be a better option than schaub? is this just because he is from UofH and people are more familiar with him? i don't see kolb as any better than the third string qb for the jets, mccarron, and i don't hear anyone talking about trying to get him. there definitely has to be some homerism in the kolb talk. not saying that to offend anyone, but kolb has sucked ever since being given the starting spot in arizona.

barrett 01-16-2013 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cadams (Post 33725)
i don't think schaub is the guy to get the texans to the super bowl after this playoff run either, but what about kolb's time in arizona makes anyone think he would be a better option than schaub? is this just because he is from UofH and people are more familiar with him? i don't see kolb as any better than the third string qb for the jets, mccarron, and i don't hear anyone talking about trying to get him. there definitely has to be some homerism in the kolb talk. not saying that to offend anyone, but kolb has sucked ever since being given the starting spot in arizona.

Kolb was brought up as a leinhart type reclamation (broken confidence but once thought talented and could use a year as a backup to rebuild a career under a great QB tutor). I've seen nobody mention him as a replacement.

And he went 4-1 last year and Arizona was 0-11 the rest of the season. That along with being a former 2nd rounder is why he is thought of higher than McElroy (mccarron is alabama's QB).

cadams 01-16-2013 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrett (Post 33727)
McElroy (mccarron is alabama's QB).

thanks for the correction. i was thinking that sounded a little off.

Nconroe 05-16-2013 08:18 PM

Ranking QB discussion
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/ey...es-eli-almost-

I think its a little off with Schaub at 23.

What do ya'll think?

Joshua 05-17-2013 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nconroe (Post 34433)
Ranking QB discussion
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/ey...es-eli-almost-

I think its a little off with Schaub at 23.

What do ya'll think?

You could quibble with this some but I think everyone agrees that Schaub is essentially a mid-level QB and whether he's 23 or 17 in some random list is largely irrelevant. However, it is the offseason so we gotta talk about something.

To me, I think the biggest frustration with Schaub actually arises out of something he had nothing to do with. For the first 3-4 years of Schaub's time here, there were a handful of truly elite QBs, most of whom had been on top for a while (obviously Peyton and Brady, and to a lesser extent Brees and Rodgers). There was also the second tier guys (Big Ben, Eli, Rivers). For the most part, these guys were untouchable and the Texans never had a chance to get any of them. In other words, it sucked that we didn't have one of the great QBs in the league, but we never had a shot at any of them anyway and Schaub was about as good as anyone we realistically could have gotten.

However, in the last couple years, there has been an influx of new blood in some good, young QBs, several of whom the Texans clearly could have gotten if they wanted. This is where the frustration lies IMO. It was one thing to be resigned to the fact that we would never have Brady. It's another to see us stand pat with Schaub while teams like San Fran and Seattle find guys like Kaepernick and Wilson in the 2nd and 3rd rounds.

Nconroe 05-17-2013 02:54 PM

So, just discussing, here are some 2012 stats at yahoo sports
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/stats/byposition?
pos=QB&conference=NFL&year=season_2012&sort=41&tim eframe=ToDate

Schaub seems to be in top 10 for most categories For 2012 in QB Rating, and percent completions, least sacks, least fumbles, least interceptions,

Ahead of Romo, Flaco, Eli, Rivers, Newton, and many more in several categories of statistics.

Name Team G QBRat Comp Att Pct Yds Y/G Y/A TD Int Rush Yds Y/G Avg TD Sack YdsL Fum FumL
Aaron Rodgers GNB 16 108.0 371 552 67.2 4295 268.4 7.8 39 8 54 259 16.2 4.8 2 51 293 5 4
Peyton Manning DEN 16 105.8 400 583 68.6 4659 291.2 8.0 37 11 23 6 0.4 0.3 0 21 137 2 2
Robert Griffin III WAS 15 102.4 258 393 65.6 3200 213.3 8.1 20 5 120 815 54.3 6.8 7 30 217 12 2
Russell Wilson SEA 16 100.0 252 393 64.1 3118 194.9 7.9 26 10 94 489 30.6 5.2 4 33 203 6 3
Matt Ryan ATL 16 99.1 422 615 68.6 4719 294.9 7.7 32 14 34 141 8.8 4.1 1 28 210 3 2
Tom Brady NWE 16 98.7 401 637 63.0 4827 301.7 7.6 34 8 23 32 2.0 1.4 4 27 182 2 0
Ben Roethlisberger PIT 13 97.0 284 449 63.3 3265 251.2 7.3 26 8 26 92 7.1 3.5 0 30 182 6 3
Drew Brees NOR 16 96.3 422 670 63.0 5177 323.6 7.7 43 19 15 5 0.3 0.3 1 26 190 5 1
Matt Schaub HOU 16 90.7 350 544 64.3 4008 250.5 7.4 22 12 21 -9 -0.6 -0.4 0 27 216 4 0
Tony Romo DAL 16 90.5 425 648 65.6 4903 306.4 7.6 28 19 30 49 3.1 1.6 1 36 263 6 3
Philip Rivers SDG 16 88.6 338 527 64.1 3606 225.4 6.8 26 15 27 40 2.5 1.5 0 49 311 15 7
Joe Flacco BAL 16 87.7 317 531 59.7 3817 238.6 7.2 22 10 32 22 1.4 0.7 3 35 227 8 4
Andy Dalton CIN 16 87.4 329 528 62.3 3669 229.3 6.9 27 16 47 120 7.5 2.6 4 46 229 4 4
Eli Manning NYG 16 87.2 321 536 59.9 3948 246.8 7.4 26 15 20 30 1.9 1.5 0 19 136 5 1
Cam Newton CAR 16 86.2 280 485 57.7 3869 241.8 8.0 19 12 127 741 46.3 5.8 8 36 244 10 3

Nconroe 05-17-2013 02:55 PM

Then for 2011, similar, but Schaub was 6th best QB rating, rather than 9th in 2012, Flaco was down in the mid-range

Name Team G QBRat Comp Att Pct Yds Y/G Y/A TD Int Rush Yds Y/G Avg TD Sack YdsL Fum FumL
Aaron Rodgers GNB 15 122.5 343 502 68.3 4643 309.5 9.2 45 6 60 257 17.1 4.3 3 36 219 4 0
Drew Brees NOR 16 110.6 468 657 71.2 5476 342.3 8.3 46 14 21 86 5.4 4.1 1 24 158 1 1
Tom Brady NWE 16 105.6 401 611 65.6 5235 327.2 8.6 39 12 43 109 6.8 2.5 3 32 173 6 2
Tony Romo DAL 16 102.5 346 522 66.3 4184 261.5 8.0 31 10 22 46 2.9 2.1 1 36 227 6 3
Matthew Stafford DET 16 97.2 421 663 63.5 5038 314.9 7.6 41 16 22 78 4.9 3.5 0 36 257 5 1
Matt Schaub HOU 10 96.8 178 292 61.0 2479 247.9 8.5 15 6 15 9 0.9 0.6 2 16 98 3 1
Eli Manning NYG 16 92.9 359 589 61.0 4933 308.3 8.4 29 16 35 15 0.9 0.4 1 28 199 8 4
Matt Ryan ATL 16 92.2 347 566 61.3 4177 261.1 7.4 29 12 37 84 5.3 2.3 2 26 173 5 3
Alex Smith SFO 16 90.7 273 445 61.3 3144 196.5 7.1 17 5 52 179 11.2 3.4 2 44 263 7 2
Ben Roethlisberger PIT 15 90.1 324 513 63.2 4077 271.8 7.9 21 14 31 70 4.7 2.3 0 40 269 8 5
Philip Rivers SDG 16 88.7 366 582 62.9 4624 289.0 7.9 27 20 26 36 2.3 1.4 1 30 198 9 5
Matt Moore MIA 13 87.1 210 347 60.5 2497 192.1 7.2 16 9 32 65 5.0 2.0 2 36 229 14 6
Jay Cutler CHI 10 85.7 182 314 58.0 2319 231.9 7.4 13 7 18 55 5.5 3.1 1 23 159 7 3
Michael Vick PHI 13 84.9 253 423 59.8 3303 254.1 7.8 18 14 76 589 45.3 7.8 1 23 126 10 4
Cam Newton CAR 16 84.5 310 517 60.0 4051 253.2 7.8 21 17 126 706 44.1 5.6 14 35 260 5 2
Matt Hasselbeck TEN 16 82.4 319 518 61.6 3571 223.2 6.9 18 14 20 52 3.3 2.6 0 19 153 4 1
Kevin Kolb ARI 9 81.1 146 253 57.7 1955 217.2 7.7 9 8 17 65 7.2 3.8 0 30 219 8 3
Joe Flacco BAL 16 80.9 312 542 57.6 3610 225.6 6.7 20 12 39 88 5.5 2.3 1 31 203 11 6

Nconroe 05-17-2013 02:58 PM

Then in 2011, Matt Schaub was 9th again, but had some other good stats, and QB rating was above Peyton Manning and Drew Brees.


Name Team G QBRat Comp Att Pct Yds Y/G Y/A TD Int Rush Yds Y/G Avg TD Sack YdsL Fum FumL
Tom Brady NWE 16 111.0 324 492 65.9 3900 243.8 7.9 36 4 31 30 1.9 1.0 1 25 175 3 1
Philip Rivers SDG 16 101.8 357 541 66.0 4710 294.4 8.7 30 13 29 52 3.3 1.8 0 38 227 7 4
Aaron Rodgers GNB 15 101.2 312 475 65.7 3922 261.5 8.3 28 11 64 356 23.7 5.6 4 31 193 4 1
Michael Vick PHI 12 100.2 233 372 62.6 3018 251.5 8.1 21 6 100 676 56.3 6.8 9 34 210 11 3
Ben Roethlisberger PIT 12 97.0 240 389 61.7 3200 266.7 8.2 17 5 34 176 14.7 5.2 2 32 220 7 3
Josh Freeman TAM 16 95.9 291 474 61.4 3451 215.7 7.3 25 6 68 364 22.8 5.4 0 28 195 7 3
Joe Flacco BAL 16 93.6 306 489 62.6 3622 226.4 7.4 25 10 43 84 5.3 2.0 1 40 294 9 4
Matt Cassel KAN 15 93.0 262 450 58.2 3116 207.7 6.9 27 7 33 125 8.3 3.8 0 26 182 3 1
Matt Schaub HOU 16 92.0 365 574 63.6 4370 273.1 7.6 24 12 22 28 1.8 1.3 0 32 226 9 3
Peyton Manning IND 16 91.9 450 679 66.3 4700 293.8 6.9 33 17 18 18 1.1 1.0 0 16 91 3 1
Matt Ryan ATL 16 91.0 357 571 62.5 3705 231.6 6.5 28 9 46 122 7.6 2.7 0 23 158 4 3
Drew Brees NOR 16 90.9 448 658 68.1 4620 288.8 7.0 33 22 18 -3 -0.2 -0.2 0 25 185 9 2
David Garrard JAC 14 90.8 236 366 64.5 2734 195.3 7.5 23 15 66 279 19.9 4.2 5 33 253 11 4
Jon Kitna DAL 10 88.9 209 318 65.7 2365 236.5 7.4 16 12 31 147 14.7 4.7 1 21 100 7 1
Kyle Orton DEN 13 87.5 293 498 58.8 3653 281.0 7.3 20 9 22 98 7.5 4.5 0 34 243 4 4
Jay Cutler CHI 15 86.3 261 432 60.4 3274 218.3 7.6 23 16 50 232 15.5 4.6 1 52 352 10 6
Eli Manning NYG 16 85.3 339 539 62.9 4002 250.1 7.4 31 25 32 70 4.4 2.2 0 16 117 7 5


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.