IntheBullseye.com

IntheBullseye.com (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/index.php)
-   The NFL Draft (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   At The Combine (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/showthread.php?t=438)

BigBull 02-26-2009 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barrett (Post 8599)
This is why I do pay attention to the combine.

If a guy cannot prepare for the combine and run and test at his best with his future on the line, then he lacks the profesionalism and work ethic to be a very good NFL football player.

I don't think that is a fair assessment of every player who performs poorly at the combine. It could be that their trainer didn't train them properly. Not everyone gets the benefit of training with a trainer like Danny Arnold of Plex. I think nerves play a big role in it too. I mean these young men that mostly come from families with little money know that how they perform could mean millions of dollars in some cases.

BigBull 02-26-2009 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8636)
I'm intrigued by this idea. A guy who was considered a top corner at Safety sounds great on paper. The problem is playing safety is a whole other skill set than playing man coverage type corner. I don't know enough about Jenkins to know if he would make a good safety or not, but there's more to being a safety than just being a slow corner.

He actually played a lot of safety for the Ohio State Buckeyes.

Roy P 02-26-2009 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBull (Post 8643)
He actually played a lot of safety for the Ohio State Buckeyes.

Jenkins is pretty adamant that he is a CB. Now, perhaps he's being defensive because he was considered a top ten pick before he ran a 4.55. Maybe he realizes that CB money is going to be more than FS money.

If I were to go by on field attributes, Vontae Davis would make the better FS. Then the 1st problem is will he be available at #15 after his Combine. He may be the ONLY CB worthy of a 1st round pick in this draft. The 2nd problem is he going to be willing to learn a new position that will potentially earn him less money.

The pundits point at Antrel Rolle in Arizona as the model. However, Rolle was given the opportunity to play CB before he was moved to FS. We are dealing with real people with pride in themselves who have been successful at every level. You have to be careful that they don't feel disrespected or you won't get the best effort out of them.

On the other hand, players who are drafted later in the draft, perhaps were not recruited (but walked on at College), will be very eager to do whatever it takes to make a roster. A player who feels he has something to prove has the intrinsic motivation to learn a new position. A "stud" who feels he has nothing to prove might learn a new position, but he'll do so begrudgingly.

Roy P 02-26-2009 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 8619)
Check this thread out its already been talked about.

Surrendering a 3rd to make sure they get their QB of the future isnt out of the question.

I'd love to trade down and get more picks, but let's step back a minute. The Detroit Lions could very well bundle some picks to the Patriots for the opportunity to pay Matt Cassel to play QB. He is the safest QB they could get because they have seen the level of play he's capable of in the NFL.

The San Diego Chargers are behind us with Whitehurst, Voler, and Rivers. Why wouldn't the Lions just trade up to #16 instead of #15? They just need to get ahead of the Jets, right?

papabear 02-26-2009 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 8648)
The San Diego Chargers are behind us with Whitehurst, Voler, and Rivers. Why wouldn't the Lions just trade up to #16 instead of #15? They just need to get ahead of the Jets, right?

That's simple....because we just called the lions and told them that the jets were on the other line. How about you handle the scouting and I handle the trades:p

papabear 02-26-2009 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBull (Post 8642)
I don't think that is a fair assessment of every player who performs poorly at the combine. It could be that their trainer didn't train them properly. Not everyone gets the benefit of training with a trainer like Danny Arnold of Plex. I think nerves play a big role in it too. I mean these young men that mostly come from families with little money know that how they perform could mean millions of dollars in some cases.

It's not just the performance though. Is he in shape? Was he ready for the drills and how they were supposed to be run? If a guy's in good shape and runs a 4.7 then he just runs a 4.7. If a guy is flabby and huffing and puffing through the drills and runs a 4.7....he didn't take it seriously. It's not just the drills either. How do they carry themselves? Do they take the process seriously, or do they just treat it like a vacation.

It's perfectly understandable for a kid to be nervous, but his response to those nerves gives you some idea of how he handles all that pressure.

Roy P 02-26-2009 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8649)
That's simple....because we just called the lions and told them that the jets were on the other line. How about you handle the scouting and I handle the trades:p

If you are going to handle the trades, then make the deal with the Jets. That way we don't have to drop down to #20, we only have to drop to #17. :D

Roy P 02-26-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8652)
Was he ready for the drills and how they were supposed to be run?

That is something that frustrates me. When a kid has to be told several times how to get into a stance before taking off on his 40, I just shake my head. I would expect a player to have prepared for his job interview to the point where he wouldn't need any instructions on the day of the Combine. In fact, by that point, he should be able to give the instructions on how to run a 40 as well as every other drill at the Combine.

I'm sitting here watching the NFL Network for the last couple of years and it never fails. Its funny, but I think I could run the drills without instructions and do them correctly. My times would be horrible, but the drill would be run like they are supposed to be.

It reflects a lack of pride in professionalism. I wish I could go back and watch Travis Johnson at the Combine to see if there were any signs to pick up on.

jppaul 02-26-2009 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papabear (Post 8636)
I'm intrigued by this idea. A guy who was considered a top corner at Safety sounds great on paper. The problem is playing safety is a whole other skill set than playing man coverage type corner. I don't know enough about Jenkins to know if he would make a good safety or not, but there's more to being a safety than just being a slow corner.

Yeah, PB, but Jenkins also played alot of safety at Ohio State, he wasn't exclusively a corner they moved him around. Come on man, you don't think that I would base drafting him at safety because he was slow. Have a little faith.:D

I was just thinking after running that time he might actually be around at 15 now.

painekiller 02-26-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 8656)
If you are going to handle the trades, then make the deal with the Jets. That way we don't have to drop down to #20, we only have to drop to #17. :D

And what the heck do you want at 17? I want to drop completely out of the 1st and gather a bunch of 2nd round picks. That is when the value seems to outway the questions.

papabear 02-26-2009 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jppaul (Post 8672)
Yeah, PB, but Jenkins also played alot of safety at Ohio State, he wasn't exclusively a corner they moved him around. Come on man, you don't think that I would base drafting him at safety because he was slow. Have a little faith.:D

I was just thinking after running that time he might actually be around at 15 now.


I did kinda forget about that...but I still don't how much "alot" is. I don't watch the big 10 much. Consider it a general statement on the idea that you can just move any slow-ish corner to safety and everything will work out.

papabear 02-26-2009 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 8676)
And what the heck do you want at 17? I want to drop completely out of the 1st and gather a bunch of 2nd round picks. That is when the value seems to outway the questions.


I would have no problem moving back several times and ending up with several picks in the second...and maybe a couple extra for the third too:p

Roy P 02-26-2009 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 8676)
And what the heck do you want at 17? I want to drop completely out of the 1st and gather a bunch of 2nd round picks. That is when the value seems to outway the questions.

I don't know yet who's going to be at #17. If Orakpo is there still at #15, I might not want to trade down. Maybe Vontae Davis at #17, if the Saints don't draft him at #14. Perhaps, BJ Raji is still sitting there or perhaps Aaron Curry or Michael Crabtree. I just don't know right now.

What I do know is that this draft does not appear to have a bunch of guys that meet all of my measurables. There are a lot of questionable players who may or may not make much of themselves. I suppose, that is your reasoning for wanting many 2nd round picks. My problem is, how many of those players we are expecting to be available in the 2nd round, end up being selected in the 1st round.

I've seen Clay Matthews and Donald Brown beginning to move up boards. Lawrence Sidbury should be climbing up shortly. The OC's Unger, Mack, and Woods are moving up. I may have 2nd round picks that I can only use on players like William Moore and Michael Johnson (guys who were 1st rounders, but were bumped down and out). It's still to early to tell. Heck, Rang has the Colts drafting Ziggy Hood in the 1st round now!

painekiller 02-26-2009 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 8688)
I've seen Clay Matthews and Donald Brown beginning to move up boards. Lawrence Sidbury should be climbing up shortly. The OC's Unger, Mack, and Woods are moving up. I may have 2nd round picks that I can only use on players like William Moore and Michael Johnson (guys who were 1st rounders, but were bumped down and out). It's still to early to tell. Heck, Rang has the Colts drafting Ziggy Hood in the 1st round now!

If there was someway to move around and come out of day one with Clay Matthews and Donald Brown then I would be all for it.

I'm scared we are going to come out of day one with Michael Johnson and William Moore. Two guys who I have said have bigger questions than I am willing to try and answer on day one.

And BTW, I have not been able to see why Ziggy has not been considered a 1st rounder before now.

gunslinger57 02-26-2009 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 8698)
And BTW, I have not been able to see why Ziggy has not been considered a 1st rounder before now.

Well, I mean, LOOK at him. He's like 3 feet tall, bald, has a huge nose, and no arms that I've ever seen. And that little white dog of his is rediculous.

painekiller 02-26-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunslinger57 (Post 8710)
Well, I mean, LOOK at him. He's like 3 feet tall, bald, has a huge nose, and no arms that I've ever seen. And that little white dog of his is rediculous.

Good one, I am sure you know this but for some of those who might not, I meant Evander "Ziggy" Hood from Mizzou.

Again that was a good one.

gunslinger57 02-26-2009 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 8726)
Good one, I am sure you know this but for some of those who might not, I meant Evander "Ziggy" Hood from Mizzou.

Again that was a good one.

Thanks. I'm much more knowledgeable of pro than college ball, so my analysis of most college players is basically either, "Wow, he's pretty good" or "Eh, whatever," but I felt like contributing something to the thread, even if it was just juvenile humor.

painekiller 02-26-2009 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gunslinger57 (Post 8736)
Thanks. I'm much more knowledgeable of pro than college ball, so my analysis of most college players is basically either, "Wow, he's pretty good" or "Eh, whatever," but I felt like contributing something to the thread, even if it was just juvenile humor.

Hey we need all types here, just keep posting. We do not have the volume of bad post here to muddle through so I prefer to play here.

painekiller 02-27-2009 11:15 PM

Did not want to start a new thread for this, did anyone else hear John McClain talk about the electronic timers at the combine? He said they had two of them and one was not working at all and the other was messing up. The scouts don't care so much because they all hand time themselves, but the agents are PO ed, because the league is releasing these slow times as official. So Joe public thinks prospect AB is a bum because he ran a 4.7 when he really was low 4.6.

John also said if the league does not correct the problem he can see less guys running in Indy and waiting for their pro day on their agents orders.

mussop 02-28-2009 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by painekiller (Post 8866)
Did not want to start a new thread for this, did anyone else hear John McClain talk about the electronic timers at the combine? He said they had two of them and one was not working at all and the other was messing up. The scouts don't care so much because they all hand time themselves, but the agents are PO ed, because the league is releasing these slow times as official. So Joe public thinks prospect AB is a bum because he ran a 4.7 when he really was low 4.6.

John also said if the league does not correct the problem he can see less guys running in Indy and waiting for their pro day on their agents orders.

I read somewhere that they were .6 slow.

nunusguy 02-28-2009 07:34 AM

The electronic times are always slower than the hand-held or manually timed 40s for obvious reasons. Unless they stay with the "official times" (however they record them), we're left with everybody reporting whatever times they want for their players.

TexanJedi 02-28-2009 09:48 AM

I finally got around to watching the DB drills at the combine and the guys that impressed me most were Malcolm Jenkins, Louis Delmas, Coye Francies, Rashad Johnson, and Bruce Johnson from Miami. Forty times, or rather the timing controversy aside, these guys seemed to have a nose for the ball. I am really intrigued by Bruce Johnson since he does not seem to be too highly regarded, but he ran well and was a natural at the drills moving his hips well and leaping at the right time. Anyone know his projected round? I am starting to think the Texans should take a corner at some point since Dunta may not be here past next season. The Hall and Aso deals have inflated the market and Dunta, with a good season, will want even more than the $23 million guranteed the Texans were offering this year.

I would not touch Vontae Davis, he has no natural corner skills.

jppaul 02-28-2009 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussop (Post 8879)
I read somewhere that they were .6 slow.

They seemed awfully slow, but you know that makes Heyward Bey as fast as Chris Johnson.

4.24

Johny Knox then runs a 4.3? and the CB group doesn't look half as bad.

jppaul 02-28-2009 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexanJedi (Post 8885)
I

I would not touch Vontae Davis, he has no natural corner skills.

Wooww, hold on a second. That is a bit much right. I will agree with you that Davis relies too much on his athletic ability, but no natural corner skills, thats ridicolous.

TexanJedi 02-28-2009 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jppaul (Post 8892)
Wooww, hold on a second. That is a bit much right. I will agree with you that Davis relies too much on his athletic ability, but no natural corner skills, thats ridicolous.

Maybe it's a bit strong, but I don't like him for the Texans. He is fast, big, and strong no doubt; but compare him to Rogers-Cromartie last year who was taken in the same area Davis is projected, when it comes to natural ball skills, timing his leap and footwork there's no comparison. He is a physical beast like his brother, but is he a football player? I just would not spend the 15 pick on a guy like that. I'd rather wait and take a Darius Butler, Coye Francies, Alphonso Smith, or Steve Smith in round 2 or so.

mussop 02-28-2009 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexanJedi (Post 8894)
Maybe it's a bit strong, but I don't like him for the Texans. He is fast, big, and strong no doubt; but compare him to Rogers-Cromartie last year who was taken in the same area Davis is projected, when it comes to natural ball skills, timing his leap and footwork there's no comparison. He is a physical beast like his brother, but is he a football player? I just would not spend the 15 pick on a guy like that. I'd rather wait and take a Darius Butler, Coye Francies, Alphonso Smith, or Steve Smith in round 2 or so.

Darius Butler. Thats all I have to say. ;)

jppaul 03-01-2009 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexanJedi (Post 8894)
Maybe it's a bit strong, but I don't like him for the Texans. He is fast, big, and strong no doubt; but compare him to Rogers-Cromartie last year who was taken in the same area Davis is projected, when it comes to natural ball skills, timing his leap and footwork there's no comparison. He is a physical beast like his brother, but is he a football player? I just would not spend the 15 pick on a guy like that. I'd rather wait and take a Darius Butler, Coye Francies, Alphonso Smith, or Steve Smith in round 2 or so.

He is a football player, but I don't disagree with you. Give me Alphonso Smith anytime over Davis. BTW, Sean Smith is what you meant right?

James 03-01-2009 08:59 AM

Raji
 
If BJ Raji slips past Cincinnati (and thats a big IF), what would you guys think of moving up to grab him and create a super-unit on the DL?

TexanJedi 03-01-2009 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jppaul (Post 8931)
He is a football player, but I don't disagree with you. Give me Alphonso Smith anytime over Davis. BTW, Sean Smith is what you meant right?

lol, yeah but I would take Steve Smith too.

mussop 03-01-2009 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 8940)
If BJ Raji slips past Cincinnati (and thats a big IF), what would you guys think of moving up to grab him and create a super-unit on the DL?

He is one of the players I would move up for. The others are Smith, Curry and Monroe. They are the elite.

jppaul 03-01-2009 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexanJedi (Post 8941)
lol, yeah but I would take Steve Smith too.

Hard to tell, seems that there has been a steve smith in every draft since 2002.:D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.