IntheBullseye.com

IntheBullseye.com (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/index.php)
-   The NFL Draft (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Tweaking our offensive/defensive lines (http://inthebullseye.com/forums/showthread.php?t=920)

nero THE zero 01-22-2010 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cland (Post 18086)
I feel like trading down out of the #20 into the second round, is almost easier than trying to get out of the top #10 these days. With the depth in this class I'd love to see us draft at #37, #51, #60, and maybe an extra pick in the third.

With the absence of a salary cap and the lingering possibility of a rookie pay scale I don't think this paradigm holds true anymore.

I do agree about adding picks though.

HPF Bob 01-22-2010 02:29 PM

It sure seems to me that our top three draft needs are DB, RB, OG in no particular order. So, before trading down, I'd look to see where each group looks like they'll be losing their top players and not fall below that.

Of course, free agency could and probably will change our needs list which is why mocks at this time of year seem a bit pointless.

NBT 01-22-2010 05:37 PM

Sure Bob, but it still gives us a chance to soundoff and give our opinions, whether or not they have any efficacy.

Roy P 01-22-2010 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HPF Bob (Post 18092)
It sure seems to me that our top three draft needs are DB, RB, OG in no particular order.

The next question is when we talk DB, are we saying CB or FS? I really think that the only difference makers at FS are Berry or Thomas. I'm starting to get on the bandwagon that thinks Taylor Mays may not be the next Sean Taylor.

We can get an OG in the 3rd, but does he crack the lineup and make an impact?

So, a FS in the 1st, OG in the 2nd, and RB in the 3rd.
If the FS is off the board, then I'd say OG in the 1st, then CB in the 2nd, RB in the 3rd.

sinnister 01-22-2010 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy P (Post 18100)
The next question is when we talk DB, are we saying CB or FS? I really think that the only difference makers at FS are Berry or Thomas. I'm starting to get on the bandwagon that thinks Taylor Mays may not be the next Sean Taylor.

We can get an OG in the 3rd, but does he crack the lineup and make an impact?

So, a FS in the 1st, OG in the 2nd, and RB in the 3rd.
If the FS is off the board, then I'd say OG in the 1st, then CB in the 2nd, RB in the 3rd.

I totally agree Roy. I think the difference makers at db are the FS, and that is Berry and Thomas, in that order. So, if we are going in that direction, that is great. If not, then OL, RB, DL, or even LB. Heck, a dominant WR to pair with AJ would be great.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.