You beat me to it.

Currently, Fred is our best CB so everyone simply assumes that means the rookie CB would become the Nickle once/if Dunta comes back. I'd feel much more comfortable having such a talented rookie on the roster who forced Fred to become the Nickle. Heck we spent a 4th round pick on this kid last year and got lucky. If Dunta isn't the same or doesn't come back from injury, I'd be happier knowing that Fred is the #2 instead of Jacques Reeves.

Now that KC is in Minnesota's spot at #17, you better believe that means one more OL will be off the board when we pick. They also got the Vikings pick (#73), so that might mean yet another OL off the board when we make our next selection. KC has many holes on their OL, making it more difficult for us to fill ours.

I can see that, but me I like having a starter getting paid way below average for his position (if he is producing average to above average).

Paying Reeves the big contract to be a dime is the thing that confuses this for me. 20MM is a high price for a guy that is your 3rd or 4th best player at a position (8MM guaranteed, please) , and the 1st really bad move made by Smith.

Dunta (and I am making a big assumption here) comes back and gets a big payday, Reeves is getting a big payday, and then you add a another 1st round pick to this mix. And my nickle is Bennett? I see cap trouble coming...

BTW Vinny, good to see you back on our board, have missed your take on things.

Interesting comment from Lance Z on 1560 this AM regarding Chris Williams. Some teams have dropped Williams reportedly because he has one arm shorter than the other, and one leg that is shorter than the other and may need a surgery eventually to correct it.

I wonder if the short arm helps him when it is time to pick up the check?

Thanks, I've always been a big fan of Keith, Warren, Bob and Dave....glad to see Keith get this project going.

Reeves will be at worst the nickle back unless he just lays an egg on the field. with the money they invested in him they have to think he is the real deal. i am not going to say it was a bad move by smith yet, especially since he hasn't even suited up in a texans uniform yet. i think smith and kubs have earned the benefit of the doubt on player evaluation up to this point, so unless/until Reeves is a bust on the field i am going to hold my assesment. I do think having reeves pretty much means that the odds of taking cb in the first round are low. i think if there is a LT there they like they take him, even if a corner is there that they have rated the same. otherwise i think they will be trying to trade the pick.

Your correct, I miss stated. I meant, if the Texans draft CB in the first, especially a stud CB, and Dunta makes it back to start this season, then the Reeves contract looks pretty bad.

It reminds me of the team signing a certain LDE to a huge contract and then drafting a LDE #1.

Also just to be clear? You think 20MM for a nickle is a good contract? I don't and I also think Bennett is a solid CB, and at worse can be a above average nickle, so no need for the Reeves deal IMO.

[QUOTE=nero THE zero;87]I think the statement about Assuming the Texans have Stewart ahead of Jenkins is very imprtant. I don't have a draft board, and I've watched Stewart a couple of times and Jenkins maybe once. I don't know that I would consider Jenkins a reach at 18. I was high on Stewart early in the season, but not so much later on in the year. I would be happy to have him, but I think I might be more excited about Jenkins.

I'm all about the trade down, but I think the best case scenario is to find a LT wherever we end up picking.

no, i don't think that is necessarily a good contract. i think the hope is that bennett ends up being the nickle and reeves the starter if dunta makes a full recovery. that said, with all the multiple receiver sets teams run a nickle back is probably on the field 60+% of the plays

My Magic 8-ball says the Texans won't be picking at 18.... :cool:

God it is good to be home btw. Am I the only one that was seriously impressed with Bennett this past year. I thought he was excellent, I never saw him get smoked like Faggins, or get embarrased, and he made some excellent ballhawking plays.

Honestly, I am very high on Bennett, I think he at worst a Number 2, and he plays like a # 1.

That is just me, but there is no way we light up a corner for our # 1. We have talent with Robinson for at least another two years, if you choose the franchise tags, potential and exhibited talent with Bennett, and 20 million tied up in Reeves.

Our corner is a # 4 pick. You are going to see some combination of a DE, LT or RB in the first two picks.

Everyone keeps talking about all the money we tied up in Reeves, but I was under the impression that even though his contract had a pretty big number that the deal was structured so that we could get rid of him after one year without major cap implications. Maybe Keith can clear that up....because I'm not sure where I got that and it could be completely wrong.

Of course, if he plays great then we will want to keep him so the point about already having money tied up is still valid....alhough Bennet will be cheap until his rookie contract runs out.

5 years 20MM, 8 MM signing.

So unless he is a June 1st cut next year, cutting him will cost a bunch.

Reeves contract is why I am saying they should not draft a CB in the 1st.

Perhaps the Texans were under the impression that Albert or Williams would be available at #18 when they signed Reeves. Both have really climbed up draft boards (at least in mock drafts) since the signing. If they were confident that OL was the way to go in the 1st round, then they wouldn't want to be caught without a decent #2 CB on the roster like last year. Things have changed in terms of what people are projecting for tomorrow in terms of the talent at positions that will be available at #18.

If the Texans are truly one of those teams who believe that you should take the BPA and Albert and Williams are gone, then drafting some other LT would be a NEED pick. As much as I like Carl Nicks, I am really considering the possibility that his off-field issues could slide him down in the draft. If they select Duane Brown at #18- I might cry.

I'm wondering if we didn't select a CB because of Reeve's contract, bypassed a RB because of the money we have invested in Green and Brown (with Taylor on the roster), ignore the OL because the best talent is off the board and Gibbs is here to work magic; might the Texans look at some wild-ass position? I mean would we consider Jerod Mayo, James Hardy, Philip Merling, or Kentwan Balmer because they are the BPA?

Now you are starting to get what I have been thinking about a week.

Except if Mendenhall is there, I have to jump on him.:D

With Chicago, Carolina, Detroit, and Denver ahead of us; Mendenhall is probably a pipe dream.

I agree with you. I don't think the Texans will go CB unless it is one of the guys they really like. Same with OL. I have a feeling there may be a trade back or a DL. A pass rush makes the secondary look better.

Unless we get real lucky and have a worthy LT or CB on the Board at #18, I'm sure moving back would be GM Smiths fondest wish if only he could
find a trading partner to offer "reasonable value" for his first rounder.

Reeves signed a 5-year contract that included a $4 million signing bonus ($4MM / 5 yr = $800k/yr prorate). He also got an addition $2 million as a roster bonus on this year's cap, which is the reason why cutting him after this year or next would be less painful... that extra $2MM won't need to be spread over future years.

2008: $1MM base, $800k prorate, $2MM roster = $3.8MM cap hit

So getting rid of Reeves after just one year would mean ($800k * 4 years) $3.2 million in dead money. If taken as a June 1, 2009 cut, that would mean $800k on the 2009 cap and $2.4 million on the 2010 cap.

Okay, Carl Nicks is still on the board, Antoine Cason went at #27, and we drafted Duane Brown.

I'm officially, not happy. :mad: